Groups, normativity and disagreement
Fil: Sánchez Brigido, Rodrigo Eduardo. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades. Escuela de Filosofía; Argentina.
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | bookPart |
| Language: | eng |
| Published: |
2021
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/11086/19335 |
| _version_ | 1801211673877413888 |
|---|---|
| author | Sánchez Brigido, Rodrigo Eduardo |
| author_facet | Sánchez Brigido, Rodrigo Eduardo |
| author_sort | Sánchez Brigido, Rodrigo Eduardo |
| collection | Repositorio Digital Universitario |
| description | Fil: Sánchez Brigido, Rodrigo Eduardo. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades. Escuela de Filosofía; Argentina. |
| format | bookPart |
| id | rdu-unc.19335 |
| institution | Universidad Nacional de Cordoba |
| language | eng |
| publishDate | 2021 |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | rdu-unc.193352021-08-07T09:29:48Z Groups, normativity and disagreement Sánchez Brigido, Rodrigo Eduardo COLLECTIVE ACTION NORMATIVITY DISAGREEMENT Fil: Sánchez Brigido, Rodrigo Eduardo. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades. Escuela de Filosofía; Argentina. Fil: Sánchez Brigido, Rodrigo Eduardo. Universidad Blas Pascal; Argentina. We are members of many groups to which we ascribe the performance of intentional actions, and belonging to these groups seems to give rise, in many cases, to special normative relations. For instance, as a member of the university I have certain duties, as a member of the football team I have others, and yet I have other duties qua member of my law firm. But what is special about some groups that claims of the form "I am under a duty qua member of the group" seem adequate? This paper claims that the standard answer to this question faces two main difficulties. Firstly, most accounts appeal to one special normative notion (e.g. the idea of a joint commitment, or an agreement) to explain such relations, a notion such that, if instantiated, it gives rise to duties that are independent of the value of the joint action. But there are cases where participants think that they are under a duty qua members because the joint activity is valuable, and only because it is valuable. Secondly, most accounts seem unable to explain disagreements among participants about the content of their duties. The paper proposes a model of group action and of normative relations among participants that attempts to overcome both difficulties Fil: Sánchez Brigido, Rodrigo Eduardo. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades. Escuela de Filosofía; Argentina. Fil: Sánchez Brigido, Rodrigo Eduardo. Universidad Blas Pascal; Argentina. Filosofía, Historia y Filosofía de la Ciencia y la Tecnología 2021-08-05T22:29:01Z 2021-08-05T22:29:01Z 2013 bookPart 978-94-007-6934-2 http://hdl.handle.net/11086/19335 eng Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Impreso; Electrónico y/o Digital |
| spellingShingle | COLLECTIVE ACTION NORMATIVITY DISAGREEMENT Sánchez Brigido, Rodrigo Eduardo Groups, normativity and disagreement |
| title | Groups, normativity and disagreement |
| title_full | Groups, normativity and disagreement |
| title_fullStr | Groups, normativity and disagreement |
| title_full_unstemmed | Groups, normativity and disagreement |
| title_short | Groups, normativity and disagreement |
| title_sort | groups normativity and disagreement |
| topic | COLLECTIVE ACTION NORMATIVITY DISAGREEMENT |
| url | http://hdl.handle.net/11086/19335 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT sanchezbrigidorodrigoeduardo groupsnormativityanddisagreement |