IN THE TRACKS OF STRUCTURALISM. STRUCTURALISM AS A FIELD OF TENSIONS
In this paper, we will use the Althusserian concept of problematic to rethink structuralism. Our question is: how to understand structuralism? How to indicate its limits when it was composed of a set of theoretical propositions that went through disciplines, which suffered crosses with various theor...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Online |
Language: | spa |
Published: |
Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios sobre Cultura y Sociedad
2016
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/astrolabio/article/view/11832 |
_version_ | 1811171318762045440 |
---|---|
author | Steimberg, Rodrigo Martín |
author_facet | Steimberg, Rodrigo Martín |
author_sort | Steimberg, Rodrigo Martín |
collection | Portal de Revistas |
description | In this paper, we will use the Althusserian concept of problematic to rethink structuralism. Our question is: how to understand structuralism? How to indicate its limits when it was composed of a set of theoretical propositions that went through disciplines, which suffered crosses with various theories and whose premises were never clearly established? Based on the concept of problematic, developed by Althusser primarily on For Marx, we will question the set of theoretical propositions that shaped it, not so much as a canon applicable to the most diverse subjects, but as a theoretical space traversed by contradictions. Thus, we will build on this concept because we consider it particularly fertile to think a theoretical field more as a set of problems and questions than as a compendium of answers to clearly defined theoretical difficulties.We pretend to highlight the contradictions that underpin structuralism because they will lead us to suggest that it is possible to identify a distance within structuralism itself, gap that will show as a variant of structuralism the one which settles the impossibility of thinking a structure of structures that totalize them as a whole. This fact talks about how structuralism internal tensions mark out the path of poststructuralism. |
format | Online |
id | oai:ojs.revistas.unc.edu.ar:article-11832 |
institution | Universidad Nacional de Cordoba |
language | spa |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios sobre Cultura y Sociedad |
record_format | ojs |
spelling | oai:ojs.revistas.unc.edu.ar:article-118322016-07-09T12:52:18Z IN THE TRACKS OF STRUCTURALISM. STRUCTURALISM AS A FIELD OF TENSIONS TRAS LAS HUELLAS DEL ESTRUCTURALISMO. EL ESTRUCTURALISMO COMO CAMPO DE TENSIONES Steimberg, Rodrigo Martín Estructura estructuralismo Problemática Postestructuralismo Lévi-Strauss In this paper, we will use the Althusserian concept of problematic to rethink structuralism. Our question is: how to understand structuralism? How to indicate its limits when it was composed of a set of theoretical propositions that went through disciplines, which suffered crosses with various theories and whose premises were never clearly established? Based on the concept of problematic, developed by Althusser primarily on For Marx, we will question the set of theoretical propositions that shaped it, not so much as a canon applicable to the most diverse subjects, but as a theoretical space traversed by contradictions. Thus, we will build on this concept because we consider it particularly fertile to think a theoretical field more as a set of problems and questions than as a compendium of answers to clearly defined theoretical difficulties.We pretend to highlight the contradictions that underpin structuralism because they will lead us to suggest that it is possible to identify a distance within structuralism itself, gap that will show as a variant of structuralism the one which settles the impossibility of thinking a structure of structures that totalize them as a whole. This fact talks about how structuralism internal tensions mark out the path of poststructuralism. En el presente trabajo, utilizaremos el concepto althusseriano de problemática para repensar al estructuralismo. Nuestra pregunta será: ¿cómo comprender al estructuralismo? ¿Cómo indicar sus límites cuando se trató de un conjunto de propuestas teóricas que atravesó disciplinas, que sufrió cruces con diversas teorías y cuyas premisas nunca fueron establecidas con claridad? A partir del concepto de problemática, desarrollado por Althusser fundamentalmente en La revolución teórica de Marx, se nos abrirá la posibilidad de interrogar al conjunto de propuestas teóricas que lo conformaron, no tanto como un canon aplicable a las más diversas materias sino como un espacio teórico atravesado por contradicciones. Así, nos apoyaremos en la noción de problemática porque la consideramos particularmente fértil para pensar un campo teórico más como un conjunto de problemas y preguntas que como un compendio de respuestas a dificultades teóricas claramente delimitadas.Pretendemos destacar las contradicciones que vertebran al estructuralismo porque nos conducirán a plantear que es posible emplazar una distancia en su interior, distancia que mostrará como una de sus variantes aquella que afirma la imposibilidad de pensar una estructura de estructuras final que las totalice a todas. Este hecho es el que nos pondrá delante cómo las tensiones internas del estructuralismo permiten mostrar el modo en que algunas de sus propuestas balizan el camino del posestructuralismo. Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios sobre Cultura y Sociedad 2016-06-30 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artículo revisado por pares application/pdf https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/astrolabio/article/view/11832 10.55441/1668.7515.n16.11832 Astrolabio; No. 16 (2016): PRÁCTICAS DE GESTIÓN CORPORAL Y PROCESOS DE SUBJETIVACIÓN EN LA CULTURA CONTEMPORÁNEA; 245-262 Astrolabio; Núm. 16 (2016): PRÁCTICAS DE GESTIÓN CORPORAL Y PROCESOS DE SUBJETIVACIÓN EN LA CULTURA CONTEMPORÁNEA; 245-262 Astrolabio; n. 16 (2016): PRÁCTICAS DE GESTIÓN CORPORAL Y PROCESOS DE SUBJETIVACIÓN EN LA CULTURA CONTEMPORÁNEA; 245-262 1668-7515 10.55441/1668.7515.n16 spa https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/astrolabio/article/view/11832/14715 |
spellingShingle | Estructura estructuralismo Problemática Postestructuralismo Lévi-Strauss Steimberg, Rodrigo Martín IN THE TRACKS OF STRUCTURALISM. STRUCTURALISM AS A FIELD OF TENSIONS |
title | IN THE TRACKS OF STRUCTURALISM. STRUCTURALISM AS A FIELD OF TENSIONS |
title_alt | TRAS LAS HUELLAS DEL ESTRUCTURALISMO. EL ESTRUCTURALISMO COMO CAMPO DE TENSIONES |
title_full | IN THE TRACKS OF STRUCTURALISM. STRUCTURALISM AS A FIELD OF TENSIONS |
title_fullStr | IN THE TRACKS OF STRUCTURALISM. STRUCTURALISM AS A FIELD OF TENSIONS |
title_full_unstemmed | IN THE TRACKS OF STRUCTURALISM. STRUCTURALISM AS A FIELD OF TENSIONS |
title_short | IN THE TRACKS OF STRUCTURALISM. STRUCTURALISM AS A FIELD OF TENSIONS |
title_sort | in the tracks of structuralism structuralism as a field of tensions |
topic | Estructura estructuralismo Problemática Postestructuralismo Lévi-Strauss |
topic_facet | Estructura estructuralismo Problemática Postestructuralismo Lévi-Strauss |
url | https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/astrolabio/article/view/11832 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT steimbergrodrigomartin inthetracksofstructuralismstructuralismasafieldoftensions AT steimbergrodrigomartin traslashuellasdelestructuralismoelestructuralismocomocampodetensiones |