El Catálogo Colectivo reúne los registros del material que posee cada una de las
bibliotecas de la Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, pudiendo encontrarse colecciones
especializadas y actualizadas en todas las áreas del conocimiento; lo que permite una
amplia visibilidad y garantiza el acceso al patrimonio documental de la Universidad.
Se encuentra disponible para toda la comunidad académica: estudiantes, docentes,
egresados e investigadores.
Si formas parte de la comunidad de la UNC también podés solicitar préstamos de material,
a cualquier biblioteca universitaria, utilizando el servicio de préstamo interbibliotecario,
independientemente de la facultad a la que pertenezcas, la carrera que curses o la cátedra
que dictes.
From the perspective of current situated discourse analysis and the associated
disciplinary strands of conversational analysis, narrative studies and critical discourse
analysis, this study examines how political and military elite witnesses construct
versions of reality in the context of the pub...
From the perspective of current situated discourse analysis and the associated
disciplinary strands of conversational analysis, narrative studies and critical discourse
analysis, this study examines how political and military elite witnesses construct
versions of reality in the context of the public hearing and argues for the contestable
nature of such versions. This study draws upon a multimodal approach which views
discourse as an inherently complex process and product involving various semiotic
layers, particularly, language and gesture which are intricately interwoven. The
examination of the data reveals the systematic and strategic concurrence of resources
of various kinds. It is shown how carefully elaborated texts are constituted through the
use of evasion strategies (refusal to answer, reformulation and impersonalization),
sensemaking practices and argumentative moves (scrip-formulation, counterfactual
account, recourse to the lesson-deriving frame), and choreographed non-verbal
resources (bodily orientation, facial expression and gesture); and how through these
resources participants manage to deflect damaging attributions of personal and
institutional responsibility and blame. An exploration of conversational dynamics
shows that elite witnesses are often allowed to disregard the responsibilities and
obligations defined by their situational roles as interrogators fail to gain, exert and
maintain interactional control. It is possible to suggest hence that these witnesses
benefit from some special licences which ultimately permit them to shape content,
form and information flow. This study concludes by tapping into the dialectical link
between discourse and society unveiling the particular ways in which strategic public
discourse represents an instrument of social manipulation and hegemonic control
which, far from generating genuine public dialogue, works to manufacture a false
sense of debate as well as an equally false sense of consensus and resolution.