El Catálogo Colectivo reúne los registros del material que posee cada una de las
bibliotecas de la Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, pudiendo encontrarse colecciones
especializadas y actualizadas en todas las áreas del conocimiento; lo que permite una
amplia visibilidad y garantiza el acceso al patrimonio documental de la Universidad.
Se encuentra disponible para toda la comunidad académica: estudiantes, docentes,
egresados e investigadores.
Si formas parte de la comunidad de la UNC también podés solicitar préstamos de material,
a cualquier biblioteca universitaria, utilizando el servicio de préstamo interbibliotecario,
independientemente de la facultad a la que pertenezcas, la carrera que curses o la cátedra
que dictes.
Discovery by Serendipity: a new context for an old riddle
In the last years there has been a great improvement in the
development of computational methods for combinatorial chemistry applied to
drug discovery. This approach to drug discovery is sometimes called a “rational
way” to manage a well known phenomenon in chemistry: serendipity
discoveries. Tr...
In the last years there has been a great improvement in the
development of computational methods for combinatorial chemistry applied to
drug discovery. This approach to drug discovery is sometimes called a “rational
way” to manage a well known phenomenon in chemistry: serendipity
discoveries. Traditionally, serendipity discoveries are understood as accidental
findings made when the discoverer is in quest for something else. This
‘traditional’ pattern of serendipity appears to be a good characterization of
discoveries where “luck” plays a key role. In this sense, some initial failures in
combinatorial chemistry are frequently attributed to a naïf appropriation of a
“serendipity model” for discovery (a “serendipity mistake”). In this paper we
try to evaluate this statement by criticizing its foundations. It will be suggested
that the notion of serendipity has different aspects and that the criticism to the
first attempts could be understood as a “serendipity mistake”. We will suggest
that “serendipity” strategies, a kind of blind search, can be seen sometimes as a
“genuine part” of scientific practice. A discussion will ensue about how this
characterization can give us a better understanding of some aspects of
serendipity discoveries.