Immortality as freedom. A cinematographic contrast

This article seeks to contrast the libertarian ambitions of two great contemporary filmmakers -Andrei Tarkovsky and Lars von Trier- through a sample of their work, and taking into account the ethical resonances of their productions. Specifically, Tarkovsky’s film Offret/Sacrifice (...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Rodríguez Lanuza, Luis Fernando
Format: Online
Language:spa
Published: Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios sobre Cultura y Sociedad 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/eticaycine/article/view/44630
_version_ 1811172880777478144
author Rodríguez Lanuza, Luis Fernando
author_facet Rodríguez Lanuza, Luis Fernando
author_sort Rodríguez Lanuza, Luis Fernando
collection Portal de Revistas
description This article seeks to contrast the libertarian ambitions of two great contemporary filmmakers -Andrei Tarkovsky and Lars von Trier- through a sample of their work, and taking into account the ethical resonances of their productions. Specifically, Tarkovsky’s film Offret/Sacrifice (1986) will be analised and, within it, the emphasis will be placed on the main character: Alexander; the same will be done with von Trier, but with the film The house that Jack built (2018) and the character called Jack. Beyond a mere cinematographic analysis, the article explores the richness or poverty of the inner world of the characters in both films and, albeit implicitly, shows their importance as models for clinical or public discussion on issues such as ethics or violence towards other people, our conceptual reading will mainly draw on the work of the philosopher Sören Kierkegaard and some counterpoints with the political theorist Hannah Arendt.
format Online
id oai:ojs.revistas.unc.edu.ar:article-44630
institution Universidad Nacional de Cordoba
language spa
publishDate 2024
publisher Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios sobre Cultura y Sociedad
record_format ojs
spelling oai:ojs.revistas.unc.edu.ar:article-446302024-04-01T16:19:47Z Immortality as freedom. A cinematographic contrast La inmortalidad como libertad. Un contraste cinematográfico Rodríguez Lanuza, Luis Fernando freedom Lars von Trier Andréi Tarkovski Kierkegaard ethics libertad Lars von Trier Kierkegaard ética Andréi Trakovski This article seeks to contrast the libertarian ambitions of two great contemporary filmmakers -Andrei Tarkovsky and Lars von Trier- through a sample of their work, and taking into account the ethical resonances of their productions. Specifically, Tarkovsky’s film Offret/Sacrifice (1986) will be analised and, within it, the emphasis will be placed on the main character: Alexander; the same will be done with von Trier, but with the film The house that Jack built (2018) and the character called Jack. Beyond a mere cinematographic analysis, the article explores the richness or poverty of the inner world of the characters in both films and, albeit implicitly, shows their importance as models for clinical or public discussion on issues such as ethics or violence towards other people, our conceptual reading will mainly draw on the work of the philosopher Sören Kierkegaard and some counterpoints with the political theorist Hannah Arendt. Este artículo busca contrastar las ambiciones libertarias de dos grandes cineastas contemporáneos –Andréi Tarkovski y Lars von Trier– a través de una muestra de su obra, y teniendo en cuenta las resonancias éticas de sus producciones. En concreto, de Tarkovski se analiza la película titulada Offret/Sacrificio (1986) y, dentro de ella, se pondrá el énfasis en el personaje principal: Alexander; con von Trier se hará lo propio, si bien con la película The house that Jack built/La casa que Jack construyó (2018) y el personaje denominado Jack. Más allá de un mero análisis cinematográfico, el artículo indaga en la riqueza o pobreza del mundo interior de los personajes de ambas películas y, aunque implícitamente, muestra su importancia como modelos para la clínica o la discusión pública en torno a temas como la ética o la violencia hacia otras personas, nuestra lectura conceptual se sostendrá principalmente en la obra del filósofo Sören Kierkegaard y en algunos contrapuntos con la teórica política Hannah Arendt. Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios sobre Cultura y Sociedad 2024-04-01 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/eticaycine/article/view/44630 10.31056/2250.5415.v14.n1.44630 Ética y Cine Journal; Vol. 14 Núm. 1 (2024): Libertad y memoria. La libertad como fantasma; 13-23 2250-5415 2250-5660 10.31056/2250.5415.v14.n1 spa https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/eticaycine/article/view/44630/44819 Derechos de autor 2024 Ética y Cine Journal https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
spellingShingle freedom
Lars von Trier
Andréi Tarkovski
Kierkegaard
ethics
libertad
Lars von Trier
Kierkegaard
ética
Andréi Trakovski
Rodríguez Lanuza, Luis Fernando
Immortality as freedom. A cinematographic contrast
title Immortality as freedom. A cinematographic contrast
title_alt La inmortalidad como libertad. Un contraste cinematográfico
title_full Immortality as freedom. A cinematographic contrast
title_fullStr Immortality as freedom. A cinematographic contrast
title_full_unstemmed Immortality as freedom. A cinematographic contrast
title_short Immortality as freedom. A cinematographic contrast
title_sort immortality as freedom a cinematographic contrast
topic freedom
Lars von Trier
Andréi Tarkovski
Kierkegaard
ethics
libertad
Lars von Trier
Kierkegaard
ética
Andréi Trakovski
topic_facet freedom
Lars von Trier
Andréi Tarkovski
Kierkegaard
ethics
libertad
Lars von Trier
Kierkegaard
ética
Andréi Trakovski
url https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/eticaycine/article/view/44630
work_keys_str_mv AT rodriguezlanuzaluisfernando immortalityasfreedomacinematographiccontrast
AT rodriguezlanuzaluisfernando lainmortalidadcomolibertaduncontrastecinematografico