DISCOURSES OF STATE AGENTS OF A CRIMINAL-SOCIAL CONTROL DEVICE FROM BUENOS AIRES PROVINCE ABOUT PENAL YOUTH RESPONSIBILITY AND THE DESIGN OF NON-CUSTODIAL INTERVENTION STRATEGIES
This article seeks to analyze the sense produced by state agents about the socio-juridical category of penal youth responsibility, as well as the relevant institutional actions which they develop in the context of the execution of freedom non-privative measures/sanctions. That analysis is produced t...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Online |
| Language: | spa |
| Published: |
Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios sobre Cultura y Sociedad
2019
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/astrolabio/article/view/19852 |
| _version_ | 1811171352461180928 |
|---|---|
| author | Fernández, Mariana Cecilia |
| author_facet | Fernández, Mariana Cecilia |
| author_sort | Fernández, Mariana Cecilia |
| collection | Portal de Revistas |
| description | This article seeks to analyze the sense produced by state agents about the socio-juridical category of penal youth responsibility, as well as the relevant institutional actions which they develop in the context of the execution of freedom non-privative measures/sanctions. That analysis is produced through a case study residing in a criminal device of social control from Buenos Aires province, between 2014 and 2016. This device elaborates intervention strategies orientated to the reflexivity and moral education towards youths of 16 and 17 years old who are judicially involved in the commitment of crimes.In that sense, we explore: what do state agents have for penal youth responsibility? how do they design and carry out penal youth responsibility strategies directed towards youths? Under the basis of which logical do they operate? How do they configure their identity? And, finally, which is the specificity of freedom non-privative measures/sanctions? Do they contribute to avoid sending young people to institutions of confinement?In order to answer these interrogations, we employ a cultural perspective of the criminal question, and we resort non-participant observation techniques and in-depth, semi-structured interviews to the agents of the Centre of Reference. Some results of the study allow us to affirm that, in the framework of the intervention of non-custodial intervetion, the socio-juridical category of penal youth responsibility is constructed, intermittently, in a reintegrative way and in a stigmatizing way from discourses of different levels of morality that operate on the basis of intervention strategies of “subjective responsibility”. |
| format | Online |
| id | oai:ojs.revistas.unc.edu.ar:article-19852 |
| institution | Universidad Nacional de Cordoba |
| language | spa |
| publishDate | 2019 |
| publisher | Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios sobre Cultura y Sociedad |
| record_format | ojs |
| spelling | oai:ojs.revistas.unc.edu.ar:article-198522019-04-16T18:45:59Z DISCOURSES OF STATE AGENTS OF A CRIMINAL-SOCIAL CONTROL DEVICE FROM BUENOS AIRES PROVINCE ABOUT PENAL YOUTH RESPONSIBILITY AND THE DESIGN OF NON-CUSTODIAL INTERVENTION STRATEGIES DISCURSOS DE AGENTES ESTATALES DE UN DISPOSITIVO DE CONTROL SOCIAL-PENAL DE LA PROVINCIA DE BUENOS AIRES SOBRE LA RESPONSABILIDAD PENAL JUVENIL Y EL DISEÑO DE ESTRATEGIAS DE INTERVENCION ALTERNATIVAS A LA PRIVACION DE LIBERTAD Fernández, Mariana Cecilia juventud responsabilidad cultura justicia castigo penal. Youth Responsibility Culture Justice Criminal punishment. This article seeks to analyze the sense produced by state agents about the socio-juridical category of penal youth responsibility, as well as the relevant institutional actions which they develop in the context of the execution of freedom non-privative measures/sanctions. That analysis is produced through a case study residing in a criminal device of social control from Buenos Aires province, between 2014 and 2016. This device elaborates intervention strategies orientated to the reflexivity and moral education towards youths of 16 and 17 years old who are judicially involved in the commitment of crimes.In that sense, we explore: what do state agents have for penal youth responsibility? how do they design and carry out penal youth responsibility strategies directed towards youths? Under the basis of which logical do they operate? How do they configure their identity? And, finally, which is the specificity of freedom non-privative measures/sanctions? Do they contribute to avoid sending young people to institutions of confinement?In order to answer these interrogations, we employ a cultural perspective of the criminal question, and we resort non-participant observation techniques and in-depth, semi-structured interviews to the agents of the Centre of Reference. Some results of the study allow us to affirm that, in the framework of the intervention of non-custodial intervetion, the socio-juridical category of penal youth responsibility is constructed, intermittently, in a reintegrative way and in a stigmatizing way from discourses of different levels of morality that operate on the basis of intervention strategies of “subjective responsibility”. El objetivo de este artículo es analizar el sentido producido por agentes estatales sobre la categoría socio-jurídica de responsabilidad penal juvenil, tanto como las acciones institucionales pertinentes que desarrollan en el contexto de ejecución de medidas alternativas a la privación de libertad. Ese análisis tiene lugar mediante un estudio de caso radicado en un dispositivo de control social-penal de la Provincia de Buenos Aires, entre 2014 y 2016. Dispositivo en el cual se elaboran estrategias de intervención orientadas a la reflexividad y la educación moral hacia jóvenes de 16 y 17 años comprometidos judicialmente en delitos.En tal sentido, indagamos: ¿qué entienden por responsabilidad penal juvenil los agentes estatales? ¿Cómo diseñan y efectúan las estrategias de intervención dirigidas a los jóvenes?, ¿Sobre la base de qué lógicas operan?, ¿Cómo configuran su identidad? Y, por último, ¿cuál es la especificidad de las medidas alternativas a la privación de libertad?, ¿contribuyen a evitar el envío de jóvenes a instituciones de encierro?Para responder estos interrogantes empleamos una perspectiva cultural de la cuestión criminal y recurrimos a técnicas de observación no participante y de entrevista semi-estructurada en profundidad a los agentes del Centro de Referencia. Algunos resultados del estudio nos permiten afirmar que, en el marco de la intervención alternativa a la privación de libertad, la categoría socio-jurídica de responsabilidad penal juvenil se construye en forma reintegrativa y en forma estigmatizante, intermitentemente, a partir de discursos de diferentes niveles de moralidad que operan sobre la base de estrategias de “responsabilidad subjetiva”. Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios sobre Cultura y Sociedad 2019-01-02 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artículo revisado por pares application/pdf https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/astrolabio/article/view/19852 10.55441/1668.7515.n22.19852 Astrolabio; No. 22 (2019): Enero-Junio; 45-68 Astrolabio; Núm. 22 (2019): Enero-Junio; 45-68 Astrolabio; n. 22 (2019): Enero-Junio; 45-68 1668-7515 10.55441/1668.7515.n22 spa https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/astrolabio/article/view/19852/22724 |
| spellingShingle | juventud responsabilidad cultura justicia castigo penal. Youth Responsibility Culture Justice Criminal punishment. Fernández, Mariana Cecilia DISCOURSES OF STATE AGENTS OF A CRIMINAL-SOCIAL CONTROL DEVICE FROM BUENOS AIRES PROVINCE ABOUT PENAL YOUTH RESPONSIBILITY AND THE DESIGN OF NON-CUSTODIAL INTERVENTION STRATEGIES |
| title | DISCOURSES OF STATE AGENTS OF A CRIMINAL-SOCIAL CONTROL DEVICE FROM BUENOS AIRES PROVINCE ABOUT PENAL YOUTH RESPONSIBILITY AND THE DESIGN OF NON-CUSTODIAL INTERVENTION STRATEGIES |
| title_alt | DISCURSOS DE AGENTES ESTATALES DE UN DISPOSITIVO DE CONTROL SOCIAL-PENAL DE LA PROVINCIA DE BUENOS AIRES SOBRE LA RESPONSABILIDAD PENAL JUVENIL Y EL DISEÑO DE ESTRATEGIAS DE INTERVENCION ALTERNATIVAS A LA PRIVACION DE LIBERTAD |
| title_full | DISCOURSES OF STATE AGENTS OF A CRIMINAL-SOCIAL CONTROL DEVICE FROM BUENOS AIRES PROVINCE ABOUT PENAL YOUTH RESPONSIBILITY AND THE DESIGN OF NON-CUSTODIAL INTERVENTION STRATEGIES |
| title_fullStr | DISCOURSES OF STATE AGENTS OF A CRIMINAL-SOCIAL CONTROL DEVICE FROM BUENOS AIRES PROVINCE ABOUT PENAL YOUTH RESPONSIBILITY AND THE DESIGN OF NON-CUSTODIAL INTERVENTION STRATEGIES |
| title_full_unstemmed | DISCOURSES OF STATE AGENTS OF A CRIMINAL-SOCIAL CONTROL DEVICE FROM BUENOS AIRES PROVINCE ABOUT PENAL YOUTH RESPONSIBILITY AND THE DESIGN OF NON-CUSTODIAL INTERVENTION STRATEGIES |
| title_short | DISCOURSES OF STATE AGENTS OF A CRIMINAL-SOCIAL CONTROL DEVICE FROM BUENOS AIRES PROVINCE ABOUT PENAL YOUTH RESPONSIBILITY AND THE DESIGN OF NON-CUSTODIAL INTERVENTION STRATEGIES |
| title_sort | discourses of state agents of a criminal social control device from buenos aires province about penal youth responsibility and the design of non custodial intervention strategies |
| topic | juventud responsabilidad cultura justicia castigo penal. Youth Responsibility Culture Justice Criminal punishment. |
| topic_facet | juventud responsabilidad cultura justicia castigo penal. Youth Responsibility Culture Justice Criminal punishment. |
| url | https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/astrolabio/article/view/19852 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT fernandezmarianacecilia discoursesofstateagentsofacriminalsocialcontroldevicefrombuenosairesprovinceaboutpenalyouthresponsibilityandthedesignofnoncustodialinterventionstrategies AT fernandezmarianacecilia discursosdeagentesestatalesdeundispositivodecontrolsocialpenaldelaprovinciadebuenosairessobrelaresponsabilidadpenaljuvenilyeldisenodeestrategiasdeintervencionalternativasalaprivaciondelibertad |