The culpa in contrahendo and useless stipulations (second part)

I have previously explained what were the useless stipulations in Roman law, what was for IHERING the culpa in contrahendo as the basis of any action to compensate in cases of useless stipulations or merely projected contractual relations, for the damages arising therefrom; the doctrinal background...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Pizarro, Nestor A.
Format: Online
Language:spa
Published: Universidad Nacional de Córdoba 1944
Subjects:
Online Access:https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/REUNC/article/view/10821
Description
Summary:I have previously explained what were the useless stipulations in Roman law, what was for IHERING the culpa in contrahendo as the basis of any action to compensate in cases of useless stipulations or merely projected contractual relations, for the damages arising therefrom; the doctrinal background in SAVIGNY, CUJACIO, RICHELMANN, POTHIER and others; the systematic followed by IHERING and the effects of error in useless stipulations.