Brazil and Mexico : the political economy of poverty, equity, and growth /

Brazil and Mexico are two of the largest middle-income developing countries and they have long histories as independent nations. Both are rich in natural and human resources. From 1929 to the early 1980s they were among the world ' s fastest-growing economies. But both countries inherited patte...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Maddison, Angus, 1926-2010
Corporate Author: Banco Mundial
Format: Book
Published: New York, N.Y. : Oxford University Press, 1992
Series:A World Bank comparative study
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000nam a2200000 a 4500
003 arcduce
005 20200221062936.0
008 100420s1992 nyu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
952 |0 0  |1 0  |4 0  |6 338_972000000000000_M_48180  |7 0  |9 21055  |a BMB  |b BMB  |d 2010-01-01  |l 0  |o 338.972 M 48180  |p 48180  |r 2010-08-26 00:00:00  |u 18806  |w 2010-08-26  |y LIBR 
999 |c 16998  |d 16998 
020 |a 0-19-520874-9 
040 |a arcduce  |c arcduce 
082 0 |a 338.972 
100 1 |a Maddison, Angus,  |9 1692  |d 1926-2010 
245 1 0 |a Brazil and Mexico :   |b the political economy of poverty, equity, and growth /  |c Angus Maddison. 
260 |a New York, N.Y. :  |b Oxford University Press,  |c 1992 
300 |a xiv, 248 p. :  |b il. 
490 0 |a A World Bank comparative study 
504 |a Incluye bibliografía. 
505 0 |a Foreword -- Authorship note -- Pt. 1. Comparative analysis -- 1. Introduction -- Pt. 2. Brazil -- 2. Interests, ideology, and the exercise of power -- 3. Brazilian growth performance since 1950 -- 4. Brazilian outcomes in terms of equity and alleviation of poverty -- Pt. 3. Mexico -- 5. The mexican polity, institutions, and policy -- 6.Mexican growth performance since 1950 -- 7. Mexican outcomes in terms of equity and alleviation of poverty -- Statistical appendix -- Bibliography -- Index -- Tables. 
520 |a Brazil and Mexico are two of the largest middle-income developing countries and they have long histories as independent nations. Both are rich in natural and human resources. From 1929 to the early 1980s they were among the world ' s fastest-growing economies. But both countries inherited patterns of extreme inequality in social relations, income, and education, and these problems were not substantially modified either by government policies or by the spontaneous processes unleased by economic growth. In the 1980s both economies faltered lamentably, in large part because of earlier recklessness in the pursuit of economic growth and because of neglect of social and political problems and goals. The author uses a common framework of analysis and statistics to explain the sources of growth in Brazil and Mexico. Drawing on a wide variety of data sources, he assesses the role of institutions, ideology, power elites, and interest groups in determining the patterns of growth. The author concludes that, although errors in policy did more to harm economic growth than did conflicts between interest groups, the initial distributions of power and political influence were the main forces that caused - and preserved - inequality. Capital accumulation and a rapidly growing labor supply were major sources of growth, and measures of efficiency of resource allocation were quite respectable by international standards from 1950 to 1980. 
650 4 |a POLITICA ECONOMICA  |y 1929-1987  |9 111 
650 4 |a ALIVIO DE LA POBREZA  |9 386 
650 4 |a CRECIMIENTO ECONOMICO  |9 385 
650 4 |a ANALISIS COMPARATIVO  |9 624 
651 4 |a MEXICO  |9 822 
651 4 |a BRASIL  |9 114 
653 4 |a POLITICA DE ESTABILIZACION 
653 4 |a PROGRESO ECONOMICO 
653 4 |a ALIVIO DE LA POBREZA 
653 4 |a ESTUDIO COMPARATIVO 
653 4 |a REDUCCION DE LA POBREZA 
710 |a Banco Mundial 
942 |c LIBR  |j 338.972 M 48180  |2 ddc